Post 3: Calling an object a poem (pt 1)
Why do I love the idea of calling an object a poem? I've been thinking about this a bit and have come up with two reasons:
1. Because objects are not actually poems
2. Because objects can actually be poemsIt may (does) sound like these reasons cover the entire territory of possible reasons, but I do really feel that these are two distinct motivations.
Wanting to call an object a poem because it isn't one:
Since a brick, for instance, is not literally a poem in the traditional sense of what I know a poem to be, deciding to call it a poem seems to stir up a new relationship between this word "poem" and the brick-object it is being applied to. This created relationship is inevitably specific to the particular pairing at hand, since there isn't a preexisting category for it to fit into--i.e., "a brick is a poem" isn't knowledge, it isn't naming, and it isn't describing. I think "a brick is a poem" is a "d) other" kind of thing--not a certain type of anything.Wanting to call an object a poem because it is one:
An object is a piece of writing that was written with really bad handwriting (is illegible).

Comments
Post a Comment