Post 6: Crossing out something in the world
a) Crossing out as a way to have something simultaneously be both itself and its opposite.
-I feel like a crossed out object exists as the original object it is with an added identity component; it’s a fire hydrant that has been crossed out, but it's now also a crossed out fire hydrant. (?) Crossing out gives attention both to the object that was X-ed and the new X-ed object, hence, itself and its opposite?
-Though, is the opposite of a fire hydrant a crossed out fire hydrant? What would be a better opposite?
...negative fire hydrant (–fire hydrant) (as in [minus] fire hydrant)
...adding "-un" to a fire hydrant (un-fire hydrant)
b) Crossing out as an action you can’t actually carry out on an object.
-I think of crossing out as a part of “writing” language–something that only exists in the flat space of a page, and in this way, not really applicable to something in the three-dimensional world. How can a two-dimensional act (crossing out) intersect with a three-dimensional object (fire hydrant)? Also, crossing out denotes a mistake, something wrong; I think of a cross-out as being on something that is unfinished or not finalized.
-Compared to crossing out a written mistake on a page, I foresee heightened degrees of embarrassment/awkwardness (=excitement) for crossing out something that seems like a mistake in the world (or for indicating something as a mistake through the act of crossing it out). This is not what my intention was with crossing out the fire hydrant here–it just seemed like a viable thing to try this out on.
Things to cross out because they do seem like mistakes:
a pothole, a dead flower, a broken benchThings to cross out because they don't seem like mistakes:a crosswalk, a building, a tree

Comments
Post a Comment