Post 8: Stripes and "stripes"

There are a lot of things that sort of look like stripes. These sort-of stripes are all series of things next to each other. Things next to each other may be my favorite relationship for things to be in--my favorite setup for things to interact (with)in. The individual things that make up this kind of scenario always appear aloof to one other, though they have an undeniable relationship--but, the relationship exists only because of something as seemingly inconsequential as their proximities. For me, this leads to a feeling of something accidental or unintentional about these things being side by side. Surely if you really wanted two things to interact with each other, you’d put them in a closer relationship than just being next to each other. Next-to-each-other has this offhandedness--it doesn’t matter, no one’s trying that hard, a group picture where everyone has their hands at their sides. A stripe is kind of interesting as an entity (I wouldn't call it an object, so I'm strangely calling it an entity) that is only the singular entity it is because of some lines that are next to each other. While a stripe in the sense of a thing-that-is-striped (a scarf, a shirt, socks) feels solidified past its state of being made up of next-to-each-other components, this quality (this -ness [next-to-each-other-ness]) is the main feature of all the quasi, not-real-stripe stripes.

Examples of "stripes":
-sidewalk squares

-books on a shelf

-pant, sock, shoe sequence

Doubts: 
-Are stripes always made up of things next to each other?
-Are things actually next to each other in a stripe?
-Can things be counted as stripes just because they are next to each other?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post 31: The negation of a painting

Post 38: A few things from The Pond Froze Over at Procession Gallery

Post 35: Writing about painting can't be done / writing about some paintings in Wet Diagram